Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
February 5, 2026

Green building assessment tools in Indonesia: A systematic literature review and comparative analysis

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

LLLendra LendraUniversity of Palangka RayaJJJesica JesicaUniversity of Palangka RayaDRDyah Ika RinawatiDiponegoro University

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

This systematic review analyzes green building assessment tools in Indonesia, highlighting their effectiveness and implications for development.

Key Points

  • To analyze the effectiveness and utilization of green building assessment tools in Indonesia.
  • Conducted a systematic literature review using the PRISMA methodology.
  • Analyzed four primary green building assessment tools: EDGE, Greenship Existing Building, Greenship New Building, and MAGC.
  • Performed a bibliometric analysis with VOSviewer on articles published from 2019 to 2024.
  • Reviewed 34 case studies focusing on various phases of green building implementation.
  • Identified a predominant focus on the operational phase of green building implementation (47%).
  • Found that Greenship tools dominate the planning and construction phases.
  • Determined that EDGE excels in operational energy efficiency, particularly for educational and medical buildings.
  • Showed that MAGC is preferred for commercial buildings and public facilities.
  • Highlighted significant research gaps in sectors like transportation and sports facilities.

Cite This Study

Lendra et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698434c0f1d9ada3c1fb33cehttps://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202560503023/pdf
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share