Background/Objectives: This study investigated the biomechanics of a hip exoskeleton during sit-to-stand transitions. Methods: Eleven participants performed the task under three conditions: without the exoskeleton (No Exo), wearing the exoskeleton without assistance (Exo Off), and wearing it with hip extension assistance (Exo On). Results: The analyses revealed that joint angles (hip, knee, and ankle) and vertical ground reaction forces were comparable across all conditions. However, Exo Off significantly increased transition time, whereas Exo On did not differ significantly from No Exo. Additionally, both exoskeleton conditions led to increased integrated EMG (iEMG) activity in the rectus femoris, vastus medialis, and gluteus maximus—likely due to the added device mass. Notably, iEMG analysis revealed a significant reduction in gluteus maximus activity in Exo On compared to Exo Off. Conclusions: Despite providing only moderate torque assistance (0.12 Nm/kg), the results suggest that well-timed exoskeleton support can partially reduce the physical demands of sit-to-stand transitions. However, the observed reduction in gluteus maximus activity was limited, likely reflecting the combined effects of the assistance strategy, including its magnitude and timing, user adaptation and training, postural demands due to device weight and external torques, and mechanical constraints such as potential joint misalignment. Further research is needed to optimize hip exoskeleton support for daily activities.
Grimmer et al. (Mon,) studied this question.