Review identifies risk factors and mechanisms for contrast-induced acute kidney injury, clarifying preventive approaches.
Concerns regarding contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) remain significant due to the increasing use of iodinated contrast agents (ICM) in diagnostic and medical procedures. Although the frequency of CI-AKI has decreased over the decades, it continues to be a major cause of hospital-acquired acute kidney damage, thereby elevating the risk of mortality, morbidity, and prolonged hospital stays. The complex pathophysiology of CI-AKI involves vasoconstriction, oxidative stress, renal medullary hypoxia, inflammatory responses, and direct tubular toxicity. Recent discoveries have identified ferroptosis and neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) as additional mechanisms contributing to endothelial and tubular damage. Furthermore, microRNAs such as miR-30c, miR-21, and miR-141-3p have emerged as preliminary biomarkers and therapeutic targets due to their regulatory effects on cellular apoptosis and inflammatory pathways. Procedural controversies persist regarding the risk differences between intravenous and intra-arterial contrast administration; however, evidence suggests that patient comorbidities and procedural complexity, rather than the route of administration alone, determine the risk of CI-AKI. Risk stratification tools, such as the Mehran and ACEF scores, provide frameworks for identifying high-risk patients and guiding preventive strategies. This review integrates an understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of CI-AKI, clarifies procedural debates, and highlights emerging biomarkers and risk models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anjanappa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: