PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026PeerJ2 citationsOpen Access

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation promotes the recovery of upper limb motor dysfunction in ischemic stroke patients: a DTI-based glymphatic system imaging prospective study

View Full Paper
YDYulan DongJLJing LiuTWTianYao Wang

Key Points

  • This study investigates how repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) affects upper limb motor recovery in ischemic stroke patients, focusing on glymphatic system function.
  • Conducted a prospective study with ischemic stroke patients having upper limb motor disorders.
  • Participants (n=35) received low-frequency or high-frequency rTMS for two weeks.
  • Measured clinical characteristics, motor function scores, and DTI-ALPS index changes post-treatment.
  • Used paired t-tests and Spearman’s correlation analyses to evaluate changes in DTI-ALPS index and motor function.
  • No differences in DTI-ALPS index at baseline between the two rTMS groups.
  • After treatment, the HF-rTMS group's non-stimulated hemisphere DTI-ALPS index decreased significantly.
  • A negative correlation was found between DTI-ALPS index change and upper limb motor function recovery in HF-rTMS patients.
  • Improvements in motor function scores were noted in the LF-rTMS group, but no significant changes in the DTI-ALPS index were observed.

Abstract

Background Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an effective tool for motor function recovery in patients with ischemic stroke (IS). Dysfunction of the glymphatic system is implicated in the pathological process of IS. However, it is still unclear whether the recovery of upper limb motor function in IS is affected by rTMS-driven modulation of glymphatic system function. This study aimed to investigate the potential utility of diffusion tensor imaging analysis along the perivascular space (DTI-ALPS) in assessing the impact of rTMS on IS recovery. Methods This prospective study recruited IS participants with upper limb motor disorders. A total of 35 participants were randomly assigned to receive either low-frequency rTMS (LF-rTMS) or high-frequency rTMS (HF-rTMS) for two weeks. HF-rTMS was conducted on the infarcted hemisphere M1 and the LF-rTMS was conducted on the non-infarcted hemisphere M1. The information collected from each patient included clinical characteristics, upper limb motor function score, and bilateral hemisphere DTI-ALPS index. Paired t -tests were used to evaluate longitudinal changes of the DTI-ALPS index in LF-rTMS and HF-rTMS groups. The DTI-ALPS index change rates were calculated, and their differences were compared between groups. Spearman’s correlation analyses were performed to assess the relationships between DTI-ALPS index changes and changes in upper limb motor function score. Results At baseline, no significant differences were observed in the DTI-ALPS index between the HF-rTMS and LF-rTMS groups. After two weeks of rTMS treatment, the DTI-ALPS index of the non-stimulated hemisphere in the HF-rTMS group significantly decreased ( t = 2.42, P = 0.028), and the change rate of the DTI-ALPS index was negatively correlated with the recovery of upper limb motor function ( r = − 0.42, P = 0.011). In the LF-rTMS group, longitudinal analysis showed improvement in upper limb motor function scores, but there was no significant change in the DTI-ALPS index. Conclusion Both HF-rTMS and LF-rTMS are beneficial for the rehabilitation of upper limb motor function in patients with IS, but the different changes in DTI-ALPS index may indicate differential effects of HF-rTMS and LF-rTMS on the glymphatic system. However, more research is needed to confirm the underlying mechanisms of this interaction.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dong et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69843543f1d9ada3c1fb3e5fhttps://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.20709
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper