This mini-review analyzes blood transfusion strategies in sickle cell disease, highlighting the balance between genotyping and phenotyping.
Background Blood transfusion remains a cornerstone in the management of sickle cell disease (SCD); however, it is frequently complicated by red cell alloimmunisation. A significant debate persists within the scientific community regarding the optimal strategy to mitigate this risk: the traditional, pragmatic approach of serologic phenotyping versus molecular genotyping, which is technically superior yet more resource‐intensive. Objectives This mini‐review aims to map the framework of this scientific debate and synthesize current evidence through a dual methodology. Methods and Materials A scientometric analysis was conducted on 224 articles indexed in Scopus and Web of Science using the Bibliometrix package for R, followed by a structured narrative review of 26 selected studies. Results The scientometric findings confirm growing interest in this topic, identifying two distinct yet interconnected research clusters that reflect the ongoing dialectic between phenotyping and genotyping, with the latter emerging as a ‘hot topic’ over the past decade. The narrative synthesis highlights a predominance of evidence supporting genotyping as the most accurate approach to preventing alloimmunisation, particularly given the high prevalence of RH system variants in individuals with SCD. In contrast, cost‐effectiveness analyses and implementation studies underscore substantial financial and logistical barriers that favour a more pragmatic, stepwise approach. Conclusion We conclude that the future of transfusion safety in SCD does not lie in a binary choice but rather in a synergistic and stratified integration of both strategies. Implementing protocols that target genotyping for high‐risk patients, while simultaneously optimising the use of extended phenotyping, represents the most promising pathway to balance safety, cost and accessibility—ultimately ensuring the best possible transfusion therapy for this vulnerable population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carminati et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: