Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This work demonstrates improved modeling of carbohydrate conformations and hydration interactions, suggesting enhanced accuracy for electrostatic representations.
The accurate modeling of carbohydrates is challenged by conformational flexibility, hydration, and many-body electrostatics. In this work, a polarizable bond dipole potential for carbohydrates (PBDPC25) is presented, in which C–O, O–H, and C–H bonds are represented as intrinsically polarizable dipoles. Electrostatic interactions are described through bond dipole coupling, with an orbital overlap contribution introduced to account for hydrogen bonding. For carbohydrate monomers, PBDPC25 reproduces conformational energies with a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 2.13 kcal/mol. This accuracy exceeds that of GLYCAM06 (2.87 kcal/mol) and CHARMM36 (3.74 kcal/mol). It is also slightly better than the polarizable AMOEBA force field (2.82 kcal/mol). Optimized geometries are maintained within 0.15 Å of benchmark reference structures. This level of agreement is comparable to GLYCAM06 (0.21 Å) and close to CHARMM36 and AMOEBA (both 0.14 Å). Molecular dipole moments show excellent agreement with the reference data. Correlation coefficients exceed R2 > 0.98. For carbohydrate–water clusters, hydration energies, including many-body contributions, are predicted with an RMSE of 3.50 kcal/mol. This represents a substantial improvement over GLYCAM06, CHARMM36, and AMOEBA. These results demonstrate that PBDPC25 provides a reliable framework for modeling carbohydrate conformations and local hydration effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: