PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026Sustainability3 citationsOpen Access

Mapping Global Green Transformation: Integrating OECD Green Growth Indicators into a Composite Policy-Innovation Index

View Full Paper
YBYavuz Selim BalcıoğluCÇCeren Çubukçu ÇerasiACArzu Kilitci Calayir

Key Points

  • The aim is to create a composite index that measures national capacities for green transformation and sustainability transitions.
  • Developed and validated a Green Transformation Index (GTI) using OECD Green Growth Indicators.
  • Integrated 47 standardized indicators into three dimensions: resource efficiency, innovation systems, and policy instruments.
  • Conducted temporal analysis and cluster analysis to identify trends and pathways of transformation.
  • Found substantial heterogeneity in transformation capacity with a Gini coefficient of 0.283, indicating global inequality.
  • Identified a three-phase transformation trajectory between 2017 and 2025: consolidation, acceleration, and marked reversal.
  • Revealed only 19 percent of countries show strong coordination between innovation investments and policy instruments.

Abstract

Measuring national progress toward green transformation remains challenging due to fragmented assessment frameworks. This study develops and validates a Green Transformation Index that captures the capacity for sustainability transitions by integrating resource efficiency, innovation systems, and policy instruments. Using OECD Green Growth Indicators covering 58 economies from 2017 to 2025, we construct a composite index from 47 standardized indicators organized into three theoretically grounded dimensions. The GTI measures transformation capacity through innovation investment and policy frameworks rather than environmental outcomes. Results reveal substantial heterogeneity in transformation capacity with a Gini coefficient of 0.283, indicating persistent global inequality. Temporal analysis identifies a three-phase trajectory: consolidation from 2017 to 2019, acceleration during 2021 to 2023 driven by green recovery investments, and marked reversal in 2024 to 2025, highlighting vulnerability to economic shocks. Cluster analysis identifies four distinct pathways: innovation-driven, balanced integration, resource-first, and policy-led approaches. Critical findings show only 19 percent of countries demonstrate strong coordination between innovation investments and policy instruments, revealing significant governance fragmentation. Validation tests confirm the index effectively measures innovation capacity but shows weak correlation with emissions outcomes, underscoring the distinction between transformation inputs and environmental performance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Balcıoğlu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6984359ef1d9ada3c1fb4ad2https://doi.org/10.3390/su18031513
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Directions of green transformation with inclusion of institutional and inequality perspectives2026
  2. 2Green globalization index reveals sustainability constraints on international integration2026
  3. 3Globalization and ICT capital endowment: How do they impact on an inclusive Green Growth Index?2024 · 22 citations
  4. 4Beyond economic growth: the synergistic effects of globalization, environmental policies, and the triple green strategy on environmental sustainability in OECD countries2025 · 5 citations
  5. 5Bridging innovation, sustainability, and equity: how green technology drives inclusive green economy in developed economies2026