This research article examines the transformation of journalistic professional identity under conditions of prolonged political, informational, and moral crisis. Building on earlier analyses of hybrid political processes, armed conflict, protracted war, and post-truth fatigue, the study introduces the concept of ethical exhaustion as a structural condition shaping contemporary journalism beyond individual burnout. The article argues that after extended exposure to continuous crisis, mobilizational pressure, and interpretive fragmentation, journalists experience not merely emotional or professional fatigue, but a deeper erosion of normative motivation. Ethical exhaustion emerges when core professional ideals—neutrality, independence, public interest, and responsibility—are repeatedly invoked yet remain structurally unattainable in practice. This condition reshapes professional self-understanding and alters journalism’s role in the public sphere. Drawing on interdisciplinary perspectives from journalism studies, media ethics, and the sociology of professions, the analysis explores how post-crisis conditions transform journalistic identity. It traces the shift from mobilizational and moral-agent models toward a more restrained professional orientation centered on interpretation, documentation, methodological rigor, and long-term responsibility for meaning and context. The article further examines the implications of ethical exhaustion for the future of analytical journalism. It argues that analytical media acquire renewed significance after the crisis, not as instruments of persuasion or moral closure, but as custodians of explanation, historical continuity, and epistemic coherence in fragmented information societies. The version deposited in Zenodo is presented as a peer-reviewed research article intended to support open academic access, citation, and further interdisciplinary research. The content and analytical structure correspond to the author’s original scholarly contribution and have not been substantively modified.
Oleksandr Hryhoriev (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: