PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026Biomass15 citationsOpen Access

Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Lignocellulosic Biomass: Structural Features, Process Aspects, Kinetics, and Computational Tools

View Full Paper
DSDarlisson de Alexandria SantosJSJoyce Gueiros Wanderley SiqueiraMSMarcos Gabriel Lopes da Silva

Key Points

  • This review aims to analyze how structural features and process configurations affect enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass.
  • Review of chemical composition and structural features of different biomass types.
  • Comparison of various process configurations (SHF, SSF, PSSF, consolidated bioprocessing).
  • Discussion of key inhibitory mechanisms affecting enzyme activity and bioconversion efficiency.
  • Evaluation of computational modeling, simulations, and AI applications for kinetic prediction.
  • Structural differences among biomass types significantly influence enzyme accessibility.
  • SSF configuration often outperforms others by reducing end-product inhibition.
  • Computational tools enhance predictions of kinetic behavior and process efficiency.
  • AI advancements improve the modeling of hydrolysis and help identify rate-limiting steps.

Abstract

This manuscript provides a comprehensive review of the enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass, emphasizing how chemical composition, structural features, inhibitory compounds, and process configurations collectively influence the conversion of structural polysaccharides into fermentable sugars. Variability among herbaceous, woody, and residual biomasses results in differences in cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin content, and crystallinity, which strongly affect enzyme accessibility. The review discusses key inhibitory mechanisms, including nonproductive cellulase adsorption onto lignin, interference from phenolic derivatives and pretreatment by-products, and inhibition caused by accumulating mono- and oligosaccharides. Process configurations such as SHF, SSF, PSSF, and consolidated bioprocessing are compared, with SSF often achieving superior performance by mitigating end-product inhibition. The manuscript also highlights the growing relevance of computational modeling and simulation tools, which support kinetic prediction, the evaluation of transport limitations, and the optimization of operating conditions in high-solids systems. Additionally, recent advances in artificial intelligence are presented as powerful approaches for modeling nonlinear hydrolysis behavior, estimating kinetic parameters, identifying rate-limiting steps, and improving predictive accuracy in complex bioprocesses. Overall, the integration of experimental insights with advanced modeling, simulation, and AI-based strategies is essential for overcoming current limitations and enhancing the technical feasibility and industrial competitiveness of lignocellulosic bioconversion.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Santos et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698435b9f1d9ada3c1fb4d89https://doi.org/10.3390/biomass6010013
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper