This analysis identifies influences on aquatic macroinvertebrate assemblage in river systems, suggesting important ecological implications.
Tributary-to-mainstem discontinuities (TMDs) are understudied, but are likely common in river networks, arising from abrupt transitions in stream order and dominant ecological factors. We present a conceptual model of aquatic macroinvertebrate (AMI) TMD directionality and relative magnitude by contrasting the impacts of hydrography, geochemistry, and sediment transport on tributary-related channel-floor precipitate cementation and the mainstream embeddedness (burial) of channel-floor substrata in fine sediment. We test that model using AMI assemblage density/m2, species richness/sample, and diversity data from 24 tributaries confluent with the regulated Colorado River in Grand Canyon through pairwise and multivariate analyses of long-term discharge records and substrate and water-quality data in three habitats: tributaries, their confluences, and adjacent mainstream habitats. Mean AMI density decreased 2.7-fold from low to high cementation, 6.1-fold from low-to-high embeddedness, and 136.0-fold across combined gradients. We also analyzed pre-dam aquatic insect literature, finding that TMDs were naturally common in Glen Canyon upstream but were more strongly tributary-positive (discontinuity magnitude, Dmag = 0.62 in pre-dam Glen Canyon) compared to tributaries in the post-dam Grand Canyon (Dmag = 0.31). We conclude that, depending on Dmag directionality, tributary confluences can function as hotspots or barriers to AMI assemblage development. Our results demonstrate that TMDs are and were common in the contemporary regulated and natural unregulated Colorado River corridor, and we expand the concept of biotic discontinuity to improve understanding of fluvial ecosystem ecology and constraints on river and dam management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stevens et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: