Evaluates ventricular arrhythmia risk in beta thalassaemia major patients using cardiac indices, suggesting monitoring is essential.
Background: This study aimed to evaluate patients with beta thalassaemia major using the cardiac electrophysiological index of balance, a new electrocardiography parameter, and to predict ventricular arrhythmias. Methods: In this study, 60 beta thalassaemia major and 60 healthy children were included. All patients were evaluated with echocardiography. P-wave dispersion, repolarisation times, repolarisation dispersion times, and cardiac electrophysiological balance index were measured using 12-lead electrocardiography. Heart rate variability parameters were evaluated with a 24-hour Holter electrocardiography. Results: Left ventricular functions were similar between the groups. Although repolarisation times (QT, JT, and JTp) were significantly lower in the beta thalassaemia major group, heart rate-corrected repolarisation times were similar. Except for Tpe/QT, which is one of the repolarisation dispersion parameters, the other parameters were similar. The heart rate-corrected cardiac electrophysiological index of balance ratio was significantly higher in the beta thalassaemia major group. QRS duration and QRS-dispersion duration (QRS-d) were similar between the groups. There was a correlation between blood ferritin levels and LVmass-i, Tpe/QT, Tpe/QTc, QTc/QRS ratio, and QT, JT, and JTp values. Discussion: Patients with beta thalassaemia major are at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia due to a high QTc/QRS ratio, despite normal left ventricular systolic, diastolic, and autonomic function in the early period. We believe that there is a moderate correlation between blood ferritin levels and the QTc/QRS ratio and that the QTc/QRS ratio can provide important information for the follow-up and evaluation of patients with beta thalassaemia major. Conclusions: Despite normal early ventricular function in the beta thalassaemia major group, they were at high risk of ventricular arrhythmias.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ertaş et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: