Analysis of Nike's sustainability disclosures suggests significant gaps and inconsistencies in labor rights and supply chain transparency.
This study provides a critical examination of Nike’s sustainability reporting by comparing disclosures across six major frameworks: the Higg Index, the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the Triple Bottom Line (TBL), and Double Materiality. Drawing on a directed content analysis of Nike’s 2022–2023 sustainability documents, the research codes and compares how these frameworks are applied to environmental, social, and governance topics. The analysis shows that Nike’s environmental reporting is the most consistent and well-developed across the six frameworks. In contrast, significant gaps and inconsistencies remain in areas such as labor rights, living wages, and supply chain transparency. These findings reveal both the advantages and the tensions that come with using multiple frameworks, illustrating where they reinforce one another and where they diverge. Overall, the study highlights the essential need for harmonized reporting practices across the global apparel sector. It also reflects both the strengths and the limitations of using multiple frameworks to produce sustainability reports that are transparent and comprehensive.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soltanisehat et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: