Survey study finds dietary factors influence H. pylori colonization in Hispanics, suggesting targeted health strategies.
Background/Objectives: Prior studies suggest that rates of Helicobacter pylori colonization are higher among Hispanic immigrants compared to U.S.-born Hispanics. It is unknown whether differences in H. pylori colonization rates among Hispanics are related to immigration status or to cultural factors such as diet. Methods: This was a survey study, conducted among self-identified Hispanics who had an endoscopy for symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Qualifying patients completed a telephone survey which included questions about immigration status and the 12-item Short Acculturation Scale for Hispanics (SASH), a validated instrument which measures cultural factors such as language preference and diet. We examined the relationship between SASH factors and H. pylori status, classified based on endoscopic biopsy results. Results: We called 400 patients and 186 completed the survey. Median age was 65 (interquartile range 21 to 82) and 81% were female. Thirty of 186 (16%) respondents were born in the U.S. while 156/186 (84%) were immigrants, primarily from the Dominican Republic. Among immigrants, 69% had immigrated before 1990. Rates of H. pylori were 8/30 (27%) among U.S. born Hispanics compared to 51/156 (33%) among Hispanic immigrants (p = 0.67). Rates of H. pylori were 51/147 (35%) among those with a mostly Latino diet vs. 8/39 (21%) among those with a U.S or mixed diet (p = 0.05). In a multivariable model predicting H. pylori status, a mostly Latino diet was the only cultural predictor which approached statistical significance (p = 0.05) (aOR 2.61, 95% CI 0.94–7.20). Conclusions: Rates of H. pylori colonization were modestly higher among Hispanic immigrants compared to U.S.-born Hispanics. A novel preliminary finding was that higher rates of H. pylori colonization were observed among those who ate a predominantly Latino diet.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Blanco et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: