Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This project examines language connections in brains and GANs, highlighting insights into architectural representations.
This project argues that latent space—the learned, multidimensional, representational substrate of neural networks—is not only a mathematical construct but, read through literature, a structure akin to architectural interiority that renders the abstract physically legible. We stage three case studies to trace deep homologies between biological and synthetic language: (1) speech-producing brains alongside speech-generating GANs, which learn by informative imitation and exhibit imagitation, which exceeds mere replication; (2) Joyce’s Finnegans Wake as a cartography of latent space, where nonce words and associative syntax model pre-narrative interiority; and (3) FinneGANs, a GAN trained on Finnegans Wake audio, whose outputs probe the limits of comprehensibility and pre-speech form. Across these isomorphs, we contend that language is a final, linearizing layer over a generative, precategorial interior. Architecture serves as a navigable armature of the interior, where the symbolic layer is often physical, all the way to the deepest layers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nina Beguš (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: