PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute2 citationsOpen Access

Polygenic risk scores for pre-MRI risk stratification in men with clinically suspected prostate cancer

View Full Paper
MFMax P FischerMAMayer AlenaABAlice Braun

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the use of polygenic risk scores and clinical markers to optimize MRI utilization in men with suspected prostate cancer.
  • Prospective study involving 500 men of Western European descent with suspected prostate cancer scheduled for MRI.
  • Exclusions for prior prostate cancer diagnosis and specific PSA levels.
  • Calculated patient-specific polygenic risk scores using saliva-derived DNA.
  • Used logistic regression to assess the association between polygenic risk scores and MRI-positivity.
  • Applied decision curve analysis to evaluate clinical utility in a hold-out test set.
  • Of the 500 enrolled, 386 men were eligible for analysis, median age 65 years.
  • Significant association found between prostate cancer-PRS and MRI-positivity (OR 1.56, p<.001).
  • PSA alone showed no significant association with MRI-positivity (OR 1.17, p=.18).
  • Multivariable model combining age and PCa-PRS increased MRI-positive detection by 14% compared to using PSA alone (60% vs. 46%, p=.011).

Abstract

Abstract Background Men with suspected prostate cancer (PCa) undergo MRI before biopsy. However, about 30-50% of MRIs are negative (Prostate Imaging–Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score 1-2), representing a challenge for MRI resource utilization. This study evaluates PCa-polygenic risk scores (PRS) and clinical markers to optimize MRI utilization. Methods In this prospective study, 500 cancer-suspected men of Western European descent scheduled for MRI (09/2017-12/2022) were enrolled. Exclusions included prior PCa diagnosis, missing serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or PSA levels ≥25 ng/mL/cc. Patient-specific PCa-PRS were calculated using genotype data obtained from saliva-derived DNA samples. Participants were grouped as MRI-negative and -positive (PI-RADS score 3-5). Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and to build multivariable risk models, including age, PSA, and PRS for MRI-positivity. Clinical utility was tested in a hold-out test set using decision curve analysis. Results 386 men (median age: 65, interquartile range: 53-77) were eligible for analysis, which showed highly significant associations between PCa-PRS (OR 1.56 (95% CI: 1.23-1.98); p.001) with MRI-positivity, while PSA alone did not (OR 1.17 (0.93-1.46); p=.18). The highest net benefit was shown using a multivariable age and PCa-PRS model, increasing the proportion of MRI-positive men by 14% compared to PSA alone (60%/46%; p=.011). Conclusions Genotype-informed risk stratification using PCa-PRS could increase the proportion of cancer-suspicious findings at MRI, while identifying those who could safely avoid unnecessary MRI.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fischer et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698435fff1d9ada3c1fb5794https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djag027
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper