Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduces AdamN, which improves training speed and accuracy in deep learning models, suggesting significant gains over traditional methods.
This paper introduces AdamN, a nested-momentum adaptive optimizer that replaces the single Exponential Moving Average (EMA) numerator in Adam/AdamW with a compounded EMA of gradients plus an EMA of that EMA, paired with an exact double-EMA bias correction. This yields a smoother, curvature-aware search direction at essentially first-order cost, with longer, more faithful gradient-history memory and a stable, warmup-free start. Under comparable wall-clock time per epoch, AdamN matches AdamW’s final accuracy on ResNet-18/CIFAR-100, while reaching 80% and 90% training-accuracy milestones ~127 s and ~165 s earlier, respectively. On pre-benchmarking workloads (toy problems and CIFAR-10), AdamN shows the same pattern: faster early-phase convergence with similar or slightly better final accuracy. On language modeling with token-frequency imbalance—Wikitext-2-style data with training-only token corruption and a 10% low-resource variant—AdamN lowers rare-token perplexity versus AdamW without warmup while matching head and mid-frequency performance. In full fine-tuning of Llama 3.1–8B on a small dataset, AdamN reaches AdamW’s final perplexity in roughly half the steps (≈ 2.25 xfaster time-to-quality). Finally, on a ViT-Base/16 transferred to CIFAR-100 (batch size 256), AdamN achieves 88.8% test accuracy vs. 84.2% for AdamW and reaches40–80% validation-accuracy milestones in the first epoch (AdamW reaches 80% by epoch 59),reducing epochs, energy use, and cost.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aboulsaad et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: