Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review of crisis-driven policy change in public policy literature, highlighting conceptual and political implications.
This article presents a systematic review of how the relationship between crisis and policy change is conceptualized, operationalized, and analyzed in public policy literature. We analyze five dimensions: crisis definitions, the causal mechanisms linking crises to change, the types and intensities of change, the political and ideological effects, and the modes of governing crises. The review reveals persistent conceptual ambiguity, limited attention to political dynamics, and a dominant focus on ideational mechanisms. Furthermore, by adopting a typology of the politics of governing crises as an analytical tool, the study also identifies recurring patterns across mechanisms, political strategies, and outputs. This theory-informed review offers a foundation for systematic, comparative research on crisis-driven policy change.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Capano et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: