Modeling and hybrid control improves gust mitigation in ornithopters, suggesting advanced disturbance management.
Unsteady atmospheric disturbances significantly compromise the stability of ornithopters, necessitating advanced turbulence-mitigation strategies. In contrast, natural flyers display remarkable aerodynamic adaptability through dynamic flow-control mechanisms such as covert feathers, enabling stability across unsteady flow regimes. Drawing inspiration from this biological phenomenon, this study presents the modeling and hybrid control of a kestrel-based ornithopter equipped with a Nature-Inspired Flow Control Device (NFCD) that replicates the adaptive feather deployment mechanism observed in kestrels. A reduced-order multibody bond-graph model (BGM) of the full ornithopter is developed, incorporating the main body, propulsion system, rigid wings, and the NFCD subsystem. The model captures key fluid-structure-interaction (FSI) effects between morphing feathers and surrounding airflow. A Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) ensures optimal performance under nominal gust conditions (≤3 m/s), while an H2 controller activates during high-intensity gusts (≥4 m/s) to enhance disturbance rejection through electromechanical feather actuation. A gain-scheduled transition is employed in the intermediate gust range (3–4 m/s) to ensure a smooth transition between controllers. Simulations indicate up to 70% reduction in gust-induced oscillations and 32% gust-mitigation efficiency, achieved through feather actuation in the NFCD combined with hybrid control, stabilizing the ornithopter in less than 1.4 s under higher gust conditions. The close correspondence between simulated responses and previously reported findings validates the proposed approach. Overall, by merging biomimetic aerodynamics, nature-inspired flow control, and advanced control design, the LQR-H2 governed NFCD provides a promising pathway toward gust-tolerant ornithopters capable of resilient and stable flight in unsteady atmospheric environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hussain et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: