Systematic review finds multicomponent training improves functional fitness in older adults, suggesting effective intervention methods.
Objective: The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the effects of multicomponent training (MCT) on functional fitness in older adults. Methods: Primary sources were sourced from four databases: Scopus, PubMed, CENTRAL, and Web of Science. The search period spanned from the inception of these databases up to February 10, 2025. Standardized mean differences, weighted mean differences, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using either random or fixed-effect models for the outcomes. Results: After the screening process, a total of 20 studies comprising 1,217 participants were included in the systematic review. The results of the meta-analysis showed that MCT improved Short Physical Performance Battery test (1.20 [95% CI: 0.98-1.42], p = .001), arm curl (0.89 [95% CI: 0.51-1.24], p = .001), 30-s chair stand (1.28 [95% CI: 0.81-1.74], p = .001), chair sit-and-reach (0.62 [95% CI: 0.38-0.87], p = .001), back scratch (0.44 [95% CI: 0.25-0.63], p = .001), timed up and go (0.80 [95% CI: 0.38-1.22], p = .001), 6-min walk (1.24 [95% CI: 0.62-1.86], p = .001), and 2-min step (0.52 [95% CI: 0.21-0.84], p = .001). Additionally, the results of the meta-analysis demonstrated that there was a significant difference (0.35 [95% CI: 0.25-0.46], p = .001) between MCT and conventional training (CT) on functional fitness in older adults, favoring MCT. Conclusion: The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that MCT significantly and positively improved functional fitness in older adults; also, the results of current meta-analysis showed that MCT has a significantly better effect on the functional fitness in older adults than CT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Toosi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: