Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Engineered biosensors show improved detection of pollutants in water, suggesting a new solution for monitoring pollution.
The growing concern about water pollution has intensified the demand for rapid and sensitive pollutant monitoring. Electroactive biosensors (e-biosensors) hold significant potential in detecting toxic pollutants through bioelectrical signal responses but are constrained by inefficient electron and mass transport within conventional biofilm-based architectures. Here, we address both limitations by developing a 3D-engineered e-biosensor with a synergistically optimized material composition and geometric architecture. A novel electroactive living material was fabricated by incorporating Ca²⁺-doped PEDOT:PSS to enhance microbial extracellular electron transport. The living material was then engineered into a grid-structure e-biosensor by extrusion-based 3D bioprinting, significantly improving analyte mass transport to the sensing cells. This dual optimization resulted in the 3D-engineered e-biosensor exhibiting a 6.3-fold increase in baseline current, a 1.9-fold improvement in signal-to-noise ratio, and an extended operational stability (>140 h) relative to conventional biofilm-based counterparts. Moreover, the 3D-engineered e-biosensors demonstrated a rapid response (<20 min) to various toxic pollutants, including Cr(VI) and nitrobenzene. Additionally, we constructed a portable device integrating the 3D-engineered e-biosensors and successfully validated its effectiveness and reproducibility for pollution monitoring in real waters. This work establishes a new paradigm for e-biosensor engineering by integrating materials science and digital biomanufacturing, offering an innovative solution for water pollution monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: