Demonstrates VAMP7's role in promoting chemoresistance in esophageal cancer, suggesting a new therapeutic approach.
Chemoresistance in esophageal cancer (EC) continues to impose formidable clinical challenges, driving disease recurrence and adverse outcomes. While vesicle-associated membrane protein 7 (VAMP7), a SNARE family regulator, has emerged as an oncogenic participant in tumor evolution, its mechanistic role in EC chemoresistance remains uncharted. Clinico-pathological analyses reveal pronounced VAMP7 overexpression in EC specimens, correlating with unfavorable prognosis, metastatic dissemination, advanced tumor staging, and cisplatin-refractory phenotypes. Functional interrogation demonstrates that VAMP7 silencing attenuates malignant hallmarks-proliferation, migratory capacity, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-while potentiating apoptotic cascades. Mechanistically, VAMP7 exhibits robust positive correlation with ferroptosis regulators GPX4 and NRF2, establishing its role as a ferroptosis checkpoint inhibitor that sustains cisplatin resistance. Combinatorial VAMP7 depletion and cisplatin treatment synergistically diminished neoplastic viability through dual mechanisms: amplification of ferroptosis biomarkers (lipid peroxidation, iron dysregulation) and induction of mitochondrial ultrastructural derangements. Conversely, ectopic VAMP7 expression in resistant clones upregulated GPX4/NRF2 axis activity and reinstated chemotolerance. Therapeutically, co-administration of ferroptosis agonists (RSL3/Erastin) with cisplatin abrogated VAMP7-mediated resistance, evidenced by suppressed xenograft growth and amplified mitochondrial pathology in preclinical models. This work identifies VAMP7 as a novel ferroptosis-chemoresistance nexus in EC, offering a translational framework for overcoming cisplatin refractoriness through coordinated inhibition of VAMP7 signaling and ferroptosis potentiation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: