Key result
GPs underestimate CV risk in 67% of patients and broadly overestimate BP and LDL-C control.
Why the study?
Real-world data on cardiovascular risk assessment by various medical specialties, as well as the perceived and real control of hypertension and dyslipidemia, are limited.
How does physician-perceived cardiovascular risk and control of blood pressure and LDL-C compare to objective ESC guideline recommendations in outpatients with hypertension and dyslipidemia?
Cross-Sectional (n=5,004)
Yes
How does physician-perceived cardiovascular risk and control of blood pressure and LDL-C compare to objective ESC guideline recommendations in outpatients with hypertension and dyslipidemia?
Physicians across multiple specialties, particularly general practitioners, significantly underestimate cardiovascular risk and overestimate blood pressure and LDL-C control in patients with hypertension and dyslipidemia compared to objective guideline-based assessments.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Physicians should verify objective ESC risk scores rather than rely on perception; cross-sectional data leaves open whether education improves actual BP/LDL-C control.
Background Real-world data on cardiovascular risk (CV) assessment by various medical specialties, as well as the perceived and real control of hypertension and dyslipidemia, are limited. Purpose To compare the perceived CV risk, as well as the perceived rate of blood pressure (BP) and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) control, assessed by different medical specialties, with the ESC guideline recommendations. Methods Two observational, cross-sectional, epidemiological studies, with similar design, were conducted in Romania during pandemic (SNAPSHOT-1, June 2021) and post-pandemic (SNAPSHOT-2, June 2022), including consecutive outpatients, diagnosed with both hypertension and dyslipidaemia. They were assessed by different medical specialties: cardiologists, internal medicine, diabetologists, and general practitioners (GPs). CV risk, as well as BP and LDL-C control, for each patient, were evaluated by physician assessment and according to the ESC guidelines recommendations. Results 5004 patients with hypertension and dyslipidaemia were included: 2469 in SNAPSHOT-1 (60 GPs, 43 cardiologists, and 27 diabetologists enrolled 1173, 776, and 520 patients, respectively), and 2535 in SNAPSHOT-2 (59 GPs, 38 cardiologists, 26 diabetologists, and 2 internal medicine specialists enrolled 1213, 765, 522, and 35 patients, respectively). Investigators perception of BP and LDL-C control, compared to ESC guideline recommendations, were inconsistent, with BP and LDL-C control rates being hugely overestimated across all medical specialties, mostly among GPs; overall BP and LDL-C control were very low, regardless of medical specialty (Table 1). In SNAPSHOT-1, GPs estimated CV risk as "high" or "very high" for 33.2% and 23.4% of patients, respectively, whereas CV risk based on guideline recommendations (SCORE) was 10.1% and 82.9% respectively; cardiologists estimated CV risk as "high" or "very high" for 29.9% and 41.9% of patients, respectively, whereas CV risk based on guideline recommendations (SCORE) was 12.8 % and 81% respectively; diabetologists estimated CV risk as "high" or "very high" for 43.5% and 52.8% of patients, respectively, whereas CV risk based on guideline recommendations (SCORE) was 17.7% and 80.5%, respectively. Thus, 30% of GPs, 45% of cardiologists, and 61% of diabetologists accurately estimated CV risk; conversely, 67% of GPs, 49% of cardiologists, and 33% of diabetologists underestimated CV risk. These findings were similar to SNAPSHOT-2 (Figure 1). Conclusions SNAPSHOT studies showed that assessment of CV risk was substantially underestimated by various medical specialties managing patients with coexisting hypertension and dyslipidemia, mostly by GPs. Additionally, physicians, mostly GPs, largely overestimated BP and LDL-C control, compared to the real control rates, as per guideline recommendations. Results were consistent when assessing a similar population during COVID-19 pandemic and in the post-pandemic period.Table 1.BP and LDL-C control. Figure 1.Estimation of CV Risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ciobanu et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension and dyslipidaemia (n=5,004). Physician assessment of cardiovascular risk vs. ESC guideline recommendations was evaluated on Accurate estimation of cardiovascular risk. Physicians substantially underestimated cardiovascular risk, with only 30% of GPs, 45% of cardiologists, and 61% of diabetologists accurately estimating risk compared to ESC guidelines.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: