Examines streamflow responses to precipitation distribution and evapotranspiration in South America, indicating significant regional variations.
This study examines the sensitivity of mean, high and low streamflows (i.e., Q elasticity) to changes in precipitation (P) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) across South America. The response to P was further assessed by intensifying its seasonal and daily distribution, specifically by increasing (decreasing) P during wet (dry) periods and high (low) events, while maintaining the annual P volume unchanged. Simulations from a continental‐scale hydrological model indicate that Q exhibits a stronger response to increases in P than to decreases. Arid and semi‐arid regions exhibited the highest Q elasticities and amplification of changes in P and PET, whereas in humid regions these effects were lower in magnitude. PET impacts were strongest on low flows ( Q low ) in the Caatinga and on mean/high flows ( Q mean / Q high ) in Pantanal and Pampa biomes. The Q response to P depends not only on the amount of rainfall but also on how and when it occurs. Seasonal intensification reduced Q low (median −6%) and increased Q mean (+4%) and Q high (+12%), whereas daily intensification yielded −6%, +3% and +6% for Q low , Q mean and Q high , respectively, in response to a 20% alteration in P distribution. Sensitivity to seasonal P distribution scaled with baseline seasonality, and unimodal regimes exhibited larger seasonal elasticities than bimodal regimes. Overall, in seasonal regions, the seasonal redistribution of P has stronger effects on extreme flows. Accordingly, streamflow elasticity provides a quantitative framework to assess regional and biome‐specific responses to climate variability and to inform projections of hydrological change across watersheds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Neto et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: