Examines how different interview formats impact the social desirability tendency in personality assessments, suggesting implications for interview design.
Today's variety of interview formats raises the question of their interchangeability. For personality interviews, a crucial question is whether different formats are comparably robust against applicants' social desirability tendency (SDT) to ensure an accurate measurement. Using a within-subjects design in a simulated selection setting with 211 participants, this study examined how SDT affects personality scores in a face-to-face, asynchronous video, and written interview-all with similar interview questions designed to measure personality. Relationships between interview scores and SDT were weakest in the face-to-face format and strongest in the written format and differed depending on which personality trait was assessed. The findings highlight the suitedness of different interview formats for measuring personality with important implications for interview design and personality assessment. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schröder et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: