Smaller CTI angle (91.6° vs 98.8°, P=0.018), presence of an Eustachian ridge (58% vs 40%, P=0.013), and larger catheter displacement (6.7mm vs 5.2mm, P=0.03) were associated with CTI re-conduction.
Cohort (n=211)
Are anatomical features on pre-procedural CT scans and catheter displacement during initial ablation associated with re-conduction of the CTI block line?
A smaller CTI angle, the presence of an Eustachian ridge, and larger catheter displacement during ablation are associated with an increased risk of CTI block line re-conduction.
p-value: p=0.018
Abstract Background Cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) linear ablation is the standard treatment for common atrial flutter (AFL). However, there have been only a few reports investigating predictors of re-conduction of CTI block line during long-term follow-up. Purpose We aimed to examine whether anatomical features assessed by pre-procedural CT scans and catheter displacement during the initial CTI linear ablation were associated with re-conduction of CTI block line. Methods This study included 211 cases who underwent CTI linear ablation, and subsequently underwent re-ablation for atrial tachyarrhythmia between January 2018 and December 2022. We evaluated re-conduction of CTI block line by using mapping system or differential pacing in re-ablation session. We measured CTI length, depth, angle, presence and height of an Eustachian ridge (ridge), and presence of a pouch on CT scans (Figure1）. Additionally, in 71 cases performed with CARTOR in the initial CTI linear ablation session, we measured the maximum lateral displacement of an ablation catheter during RF delivery using CARTOR VISITAG Module. We compared these measurements of CT scans and Mapping between the re-conduction group and the non-re-conduction group. Furthermore, we examined the correlation between maximum displacement and CT-measured anatomical features. Results In 211 cases with available CT scans, Re-conduction of the CTI block line were observed in 48 cases . There was no significant difference in the CTI length (P=0.59), depth (P=0.37)or the presence of a pouch (P=0.42)between the two groups. However, in the re-conduction group, CTI angle was significantly smaller (91.6°±20.3°VS 98.8°±17.7°,P=0.018)and the rate of cases with a ridge were significantly higher (58%/42% VS 40%/60%, P=0.013). In 71 cases using CARTO system, re-conduction of the CTI block line was observed in 21 cases. Maximum displacement was significantly larger in the re-conduction group (6.7mm±2.2mm VS 5.2mm±2.8mm, P=0.03). (Figure2) Furthermore, In the two groups (smaller angle group and larger angle group devided by median angle), maximum displacement was significantly larger (6.1mm±2.4mm VS 4.7mm±1.4mm, P=0.01) in the smaller angle group. In the two groups based on the presence or absence of a ridge, maximum displacement was significantly larger in the ridge group (6.0mm±2.1mm VS 4.7mm±1.9mm ,P=0.03). Conclusion This study revealed that a smaller CTI angle, the presence of a ridge, and a larger maximum displacement of the ablation catheter may be associated with re-conduction of CTI blockline . Also, This study suggested that catheter displacement during ablation may result from the anatomical characteristics of the CTI and influence re-conduction of CTI block line.CTI anatomical features on CT scans Representative cases
Inoue et al. (Sat,) conducted a cohort in Common atrial flutter (n=211). Smaller CTI angle, presence of Eustachian ridge, and larger catheter displacement vs. Larger CTI angle, absence of ridge, and smaller catheter displacement was evaluated on Re-conduction of CTI block line (p=0.018). Smaller CTI angle (91.6° vs 98.8°, P=0.018), presence of an Eustachian ridge (58% vs 40%, P=0.013), and larger catheter displacement (6.7mm vs 5.2mm, P=0.03) were associated with CTI re-conduction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: