PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 6, 2026European Heart Journal0 citations

Assessment of blood pressure variability in patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction

View Full Paper
ASA SakalidisKDK D DimitriadisAKA E Karanikola

Key Result

Coronary microvascular dysfunction was associated with a lower difference between daytime and nighttime diastolic blood pressure compared to controls (6.4 vs 10.1 mmHg, p=0.11).

Key Points

  • This study aims to compare day-to-night blood pressure variability between patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction and those without it.
  • Functional coronary angiography was performed to assess coronary circulation.
  • Coronary flow reserve (CFR) and index of microvascular resistance (IMR) were measured for CMD classification.
  • 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was used to evaluate blood pressure variability.
  • Statistical analyses were performed using multivariable linear mixed models adjusted for various covariates.
  • Patients with CMD exhibited a lower difference in daytime and nighttime diastolic blood pressure (DBP) compared to controls.
  • CMD group showed a higher pulse pressure index (PPi) and distinct daytime-nighttime BP variations as independent predictors of CMD.
  • Trends suggested a higher prevalence of nocturnal non-dipping patterns in CMD patients, with the day-to-night DBP difference significantly associated with CMD.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=94)

Structured PICO

Do patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction exhibit different day-to-night blood pressure variability compared to individuals without CMD?

P
Population
94 patients undergoing functional coronary angiography, including 46 with coronary microvascular dysfunction and 48 controls, assessed for day-to-night blood pressure variability.
E
Exposure
Presence of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) defined by abnormal coronary flow reserve (CFR <2.5) and index of microvascular resistance (IMR ≥25).
C
Comparator
Absence of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD).
O
Outcome
Day-to-night blood pressure variability (BPV) assessed using cuff-based 24h-Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM).surrogate

Patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction exhibit altered blood pressure variability, including a higher pulse pressure index and less pronounced nocturnal diastolic blood pressure drop, suggesting a link between systemic hemodynamics and microvascular disease.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 6.4% vs 10.1%

p-value: p=0.11

Abstract

Abstract Background Recent research suggests that patients with ischemia and no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) are at a higher risk for cardiovascular (CV) events. Additionally, there is growing evidence that elevated blood pressure variability (BPV) and nocturnal blood pressure (BP) dipping is linked to increased CV disease risk.This study aims to assess whether patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) exhibit different day-to-night BPV compared to individuals without CMD. Purpose This study aims to assess whether patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) exhibit different day-to-night BPV compared to individuals without CMD. Methods All participants underwent functional coronary angiography with coronary circulation physiology assessment. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) and index of microvascular resistance(IMR) were measured. CMD patients were classified into 2 subgroups, structural and functional endotype(CFR 2.5 & IMR ≥25 were considered abnormal). In addition, in all participants, BPV was assessed using cuff-based 24h-Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM). We analyzed all outcomes using multivariable linear mixed models, adjusted for age, sex, optic disc size, axial length, and BP parameters. Results We included 94 patients in total. 48 patients without CMD, control group female, 57%, mean age: 62.9±7.3 years and 46 patients with CMD, CMD group (female, 67%, mean age: 59.7±9.3 years). In CMD group, 37% had a normal value of IMR, indicating functional CMD endotype, while 63% had an abnormal IMR, indicating structural endotype. The lower difference between daytime and nighttime DBP was significantly correlated with CMD (6.4± 5.7 vs 10.1±.7 mmHg, p=0.11). Besides, CMD group was characterized by higher pulse pressure index (PPi) and increased difference between day and night PPi were independent predictor of CMD. Besides, there was a trend towards statistical significance for the nocturnal non-dipping pattern for CMD group (p=0.54). After adjustment of all covariants, the day to nighttime DBP difference was always significantly associated with CMD. There was no statistical difference in 24-hour, day and night blood pressure SDs between CMD & control groups. Conclusion Patients with CMD are characterized by differences in BPV and increased pulse pressure index compared with controls independently of demographic, clinical and hemodynamic confounders. Moreover, there was a high prevalence of non-dipping patterns among CMD patients as well as less pronounced nocturnal DBP drop, compared to SBP drop. These novel observations help to clarify aspects of CMD and, thus, to develop new evidence-based risk assessment tools and effective therapeutic strategies for this rapidly growing patient population. Pharmacologic therapies targeting interventions to prevent alterations in nighttime BP profile may prove invaluable in the management of these patients.Functional coronary angiogram CMD and Blood Pressure Variability

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sakalidis et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Coronary microvascular dysfunction (n=94). Coronary microvascular dysfunction vs. No coronary microvascular dysfunction was evaluated on Difference between daytime and nighttime diastolic blood pressure (p=0.11). Coronary microvascular dysfunction was associated with a lower difference between daytime and nighttime diastolic blood pressure compared to controls (6.4 vs 10.1 mmHg, p=0.11).

synapsesocial.com/papers/698585678f7c464f23008c2ahttps://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.1986
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper