The Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology discusses an updated definition of measurement uncertainty, indicating improvements for laboratory accreditation management.
The Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (JCGM) today presents a definition of measurement uncertainty that modifies the previous one and improves the management of scenarios other than scalar (quantitative) measurements, such as classificatory or qualitative (nominal and ordinal) properties. Nominal results are often found in biology and medicine. For the accreditation of medical laboratories and testing laboratories, both ISO 15189 and ISO 17025 require the management of these situations, using the professional expertise of specialists with the support of manufacturers. Some of the members of JCGM WG2 developed a discussion on the concept of measurement uncertainty and raised some criticisms. ISO produces detailed guides for this purpose, such as ISO 20914, ISO 27877, ISO 16393, ISO 20397-2, and ISO 22692. Laboratories now have all the tools they need to meet accreditation requirements on uncertainty.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marco Pradella (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: