Key result
Higher Cardiometabolic Index linked to ~59% greater MACE risk in ACS patients.
Why the study?
The relationship between Cardiometabolic Index and inflammation-mediated vulnerable plaque, as well as MACE differences across plaque types, remained to be investigated in ACS.
Is the Cardiometabolic Index associated with vulnerable plaque characteristics and major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Cohort (n=270)
Is the Cardiometabolic Index associated with vulnerable plaque characteristics and major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
The Cardiometabolic Index is a significant predictor of vulnerable plaque and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome, partially mediated by systemic inflammation.
Introduction This study aimed to investigate the relationship between Cardiometabolic Index (CMI) and inflammation-mediated vulnerable plaque and to compare the differences in the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among patients with different plaque types. Methods A total of 270 patients with ACS who underwent Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) imaging from January 2023 to January 2024 were included. Patients were categorized based on tertiles of CMI, and OCT was used to assess coronary plaque characteristics. The mediation package in R 4.4.2 was used to explore the potential mechanisms of inflammation in the association between CMI and vulnerable plaques. MACE was defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, and ischemic stroke. Results Patients with higher CMI exhibited a greater prevalence of thin-cap fibroatheromas (TCFA) and macrophage infiltration. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) mediated approximately 17.0% of the association between CMI and minimum FCT [Indirect effect = -5.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) = (-12.70, -1.27), P = 0.016]. COX regression analysis showed a positive correlation between CMI and MACE [hazard ratio(HR) = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.07-2.38, P = 0.022]. Subgroup analysis revealed that CMI was associated with MACE only in subgroups with TCFA, absence of calcification, minimal FCT < median, and maximum lipid arc≥median, with patients having TCFA/high CMI (HR=2.94,95% CI=1.15-7.54, P=0.025) or no calcification/high CMI (HR=2.88,95% CI=1.03-8.08, P=0.044) exhibiting poorer prognoses. Conclusion CMI is a significant predictor of vulnerable plaque and adverse prognosis in patients with ACS, with systemic inflammation emerging as a key mediator.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yan et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Acute coronary syndrome (n=270). Cardiometabolic Index (CMI) vs. Lower CMI tertiles was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (composite of all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, and ischemic stroke) (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.07-2.38, p=0.022). Higher Cardiometabolic Index was associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (HR 1.59; 95% CI 1.07-2.38; P=0.022) in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: