PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 6, 2026Quaternary Research0 citations

A new age for the initiation of an overflowing Lake Gunnison and the regressive phase of Lake Bonneville

View Full Paper
CBChristopher D. BradburyDDDavid A. DinterJSJoel Q.G. Spencer

Key Points

  • This research aims to determine the timing of the Lake Gunnison overflow and its relationship to the regressive phase of Lake Bonneville.
  • Analysis of gravel spit formation at Sunstone Knoll
  • Radiocarbon dating of Anodonta shells
  • Optically stimulated luminescence dating
  • Strontium isotope ratio measurement
  • Lake Gunnison overflow initiation dated at approximately 15.5 cal ka
  • Comparison shows older spit development at Sunstone Knoll with younger spits in Lake Gunnison
  • Strontium isotope ratios align with those of Lake Gunnison
  • Major climatic shift occurred around 16.5 cal ka impacting lake hydrology

Abstract

Abstract An ∼0.2-km-long gravel spit (1398 m above sea level) at Sunstone Knoll in the Sevier basin, Utah, prograded into Lake Gunnison, a shallow lake in the Sevier basin that overflowed northward into the Great Salt Lake basin during the regressive phase of Lake Bonneville. Six radiocarbon dates for Anodonta shells and one optically stimulated luminescence age, which overlaps with the uncertainty range of the radiocarbon dates, yield an age for spit development and therefore, the initiation of Lake Gunnison overflow, at ∼15.5 cal ka. This age is older than the age of a larger spit 8 m lower in elevation that ended its progradation in Lake Gunnison about 12 cal ka. Strontium isotope ratios of the Anodonta shells from Sunstone Knoll (0.71049, 0.71059, 0.71064) are within the range of values for Lake Gunnison. The new date from Sunstone Knoll is consistent with cosmogenic dates from the Provo shoreline for the initiation of the regressive phase of Lake Bonneville (about 70 m higher than the spit). The major climatic shift, which caused the lake water budget and hydrology to change from overflowing while the Provo shoreline was forming to closed-basin conditions during the regressive phase, occurred by about 16.5 cal ka.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bradbury et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698585bd8f7c464f230094bdhttps://doi.org/10.1017/qua.2025.10048
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper