PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 6, 2026Annals of the American Thoracic Society1 citationsOpen Access

Lung cancer screening care pathways in community settings: An examination of three healthcare systems

View Full Paper
CWCasey WalshFred Hutch Cancer CenterLPLorella PalazzoLHLaurel HansellKaiser Permanente

Key Points

  • The study aims to understand the workflows for lung cancer screening in community healthcare settings.
  • Conducted a case study in three community-based lung cancer screening programs in Washington state.
  • Utilized multi-method data collection including ethnographic assessments, interviews, and member checking.
  • Analyzed the integration of findings to develop lung cancer screening workflows across settings.
  • Identified varying levels of centralized support and staff involvement in lung cancer screening care.
  • Highlighted the need for improved patient education and outreach in all programs.
  • Documented gaps in care along the lung cancer screening continuum that require attention.

Abstract

Abstract Background Lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is recommended for individuals ages 50-80 with a high-risk tobacco history, but implementation of LCS in community settings remains a significant challenge. The benefits of LCS are tempered by both low uptake and low adherence to recommended follow-up, supporting the need for community-engaged research in this area. Objective The objective of this study was to understand LCS workflows throughout the care continuum in representative community-care settings. Design This is a case study informed by multi-method data collection to characterize three community-based LCS programs in Washington state who are participating in a hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial to enhance LCS program care coordination. Participants This research was conducted in collaboration with three community-based LCS referral programs. Participants included program partners who participated in formalized site visits and interviews. Approach To develop and refine LCS workflows, we triangulated data from rapid ethnographic assessment site visits (n = 5), semi-structured interviews with care providers (n = 15), and member checking with key programmatic partners from each site. Rapid Group Analysis Process was used to integrate findings and guide the development and visualization of LCS workflows. Key Results The three community-based programs provide LCS services for their regional primary care networks with various levels of centralized programmatic support. LCS workflows from each site demonstrate varied staff involvement and resources along the LCS care continuum. Provider interviews identified the need for patient education and outreach, provider support and resources, and attention to gaps in care along the LCS continuum. Conclusions The LCS system-level workflows demonstrate three approaches to LCS care in community settings. LCS workflows can enable the timely identification of barriers and facilitators to improving LCS implementation in community settings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Walsh et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698585bd8f7c464f2300952fhttps://doi.org/10.1093/annalsats/aaoag029
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Process perspectives on lung cancer screening in primary care: a qualitative study of providers and staff in an urban U.S. healthcare system2026
  2. 2Early implementation of a lung cancer screening program in a safety-net health system.2026
  3. 3Lung cancer screening experiences among patients with a smoking history and primary care providers: a qualitative study2025 · 1 citations
  4. 4Population Health Nurse–Driven Lung Cancer Screening2024 · 4 citations
  5. 5A80-2-22 Lung Cancer Screening Navigation in the Electronic Health Record for Eligible Patients in Primary Care: A Quality Improvement Project2026