Key result
Convergent procedure with LAA exclusion achieves ~78% one-year atrial tachyarrhythmia freedom in PsAF and LSPsAF.
Why the study?
Endocardial catheter ablation of persistent and long-standing persistent AF has suboptimal outcomes, and real-world evidence for the hybrid Convergent procedure remains limited.
Does the hybrid Convergent ablation procedure with LAA exclusion improve arrhythmia-free survival in patients with persistent or long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=65)
No
Does the hybrid Convergent ablation procedure with LAA exclusion improve arrhythmia-free survival in patients with persistent or long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 76.9% vs 78.9%
p-value: p=0.96
The hybrid Convergent ablation procedure with LAA exclusion achieved a 77.7% one-year freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias in a real-world cohort of patients with persistent or long-standing persistent AF.
May support hybrid Convergent with LAA exclusion in PsAF/LSPsAF; extends observational data but leaves randomized confirmation open.
Background Endocardial catheter ablation of persistent (PsAF) and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (LSPsAF) is associated with suboptimal outcomes. The hybrid "Convergent" two-stage surgical ablation procedure is associated with improved long-term outcomes, but real-world evidence remains limited. Purpose We characterized the efficacy of the Convergent procedure with concomitant left atrial appendage (LAA) exclusion in achieving arrhythmia-free survival among patients with PsAF or LSPsAF. Methods Single-center retrospective study of 65 patients who underwent the Convergent procedure from 2021-2023 for PsAF (n=36) or LSPsAF (n=29). The primary endpoint was one-year freedom from any documented atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT) >30 seconds after a 90-day blanking period. Results Mean age was 67.5 ± 10.3 years, there was a male predominance (78.5%), mean BMI of 29.2 ± 5.0 kg/m2, and mean LA volume index was 42.4 ± 14.9 ml/m2. LAA clipping was performed in 98.5% of patients, and the Ligament of Marshall was divided in 67.7% of patients. In the cohort, 24.5% had prior AF catheter ablation, and mean number of failed antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) was 0.60 ± 0.7. Overall freedom from any AT at one year was 77.7%, without AADs in 89.4% of patients. We found no significant difference in the primary endpoint for patients with PsAF vs LSPsAF (76.9% vs 78.9%, log-rank p = 0.96). There was a 3.1% post-procedural complication rate. Conclusion The Convergent ablation procedure with concomitant LAA exclusion confers excellent freedom from recurrent AT at one year and should be considered in PsAF or LSPsAF patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hong et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Persistent or long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (n=65). Convergent procedure for persistent AF (PsAF) vs. Convergent procedure for long-standing persistent AF (LSPsAF) was evaluated on One-year freedom from any documented atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT) >30 seconds after a 90-day blanking period (p=0.96). The Convergent ablation procedure with LAA exclusion achieved 77.7% freedom from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia at one year, with similar efficacy in PsAF and LSPsAF (76.9% vs 78.9%, p=0.96).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: