Theoretical framework resolves capability and safety trade-off in AI, suggesting a path for stable superintelligence.
Current paradigms in Artificial Intelligence face a seemingly intractable trade-off between Capability and Safety. Systems capable of recursive self-improvement (the "Singularity") risk unbounded instability, while systems with provable safety guarantees ("Bounded Optimality") are mathematically prevented from generating novel solutions. This paper introduces the General Interaction Dynamics Engine (GIDE), a theoretical framework that resolves this paradox. We present a mechanism for Finite Recursive Growth—an "Intelligence Ratchet"—that allows an AI system to exhibit transient bursts of superintelligent creativity while remaining rigorously bounded by physical and information-theoretic safety constraints. We formally define the Predictability Horizon (Tpred) for chaotic cognition and the Semantic Grounding Invariant that couples learning rates to physical verification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael G. Harris (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: