PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 6, 2026European Heart Journal0 citations

A novel technique using a pulmonary artery catheter for sheath placement in left bundle branch area pacing

View Full Paper
RGRajwinder S. GillDeborah Heart and Lung CenterGCGin Den William ChangBrighton and Sussex Medical SchoolMSMeet ShahRutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Key Result

Left Bundle Branch Area pacing lead placement using a pulmonary artery catheter was successful without periprocedural complications in 48 patients, shortening QRS duration by 20±5 ms (P<0.001).

Key Points

  • The study aims to describe a new method for sheath placement in LBBA pacing using a pulmonary artery catheter and assess its safety and effectiveness.
  • Analyzed consecutive LBBA pacing lead placements from June 2023 to February 2024.
  • Used a standard 7F pulmonary artery catheter to guide sheath positioning under fluoroscopy.
  • Collected baseline procedural and clinical parameters for analysis.
  • Fluoroscopy times averaged 6.3±2.9 minutes for de novo pacemaker implants and 14.7±4.7 minutes for CRT implants.
  • Successfully implanted LBBA leads without periprocedural complications.
  • Shortened QRS duration by 20±5 ms, indicating improved electrical conduction.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=48)

Structured PICO

Does a novel method using a pulmonary artery catheter improve procedural efficiency and safety in patients undergoing left bundle branch area pacing?

P
Population
48 patients (mean age 75.4 years, 29% female) undergoing Left Bundle Branch Area pacing lead placement using a novel pulmonary artery catheter-aided method.
E
Exposure
Novel method for LBB sheath placement using a standard 7F pulmonary artery (PA) catheter to guide the sheath to the desired location.
O
Outcome
Procedural safety and efficacy (fluoroscopy times, procedural success, and periprocedural complications)safety

Using a pulmonary artery catheter to guide sheath placement for left bundle branch area pacing is safe, highly successful, and may significantly reduce fluoroscopy times.

Main Result

p-value: p=<0.001

Abstract

Abstract Background As Left Bundle Branch Area (LBBA) pacing gains popularity, improving procedural efficiency and safety is crucial. Published pooled data show fluoroscopy times for LBBA pacing exceed 16 minutes. Achieving optimal positioning of dedicated LBB sheaths on the RV septum remains challenging due to the double-curved design, which complicates maneuverability, risks unintended coronary sinus entry, and increases the potential for conduction system injury. Objective This study aims to describe a novel method for LBB sheath placement using a Pulmonary Artery (PA) catheter and evaluate its safety and efficacy. Methods From June of 2023 to February of 2024, data was collected on consecutive cases of LBBA pacing lead placement using the novel method aided by PA catheter. In brief, a standard 7F PA catheter was advanced through specialized LBBA sheaths and positioned in the right main pulmonary artery under fluoroscopy. The sheath was then advanced over the PA catheter to the desired location. PA catheter was then removed and an active pacing lead was placed into the septal location as per standard protocol (Figure). Baseline procedural and clinical parameters were collected and analyzed. Results In 48 patients (75.4±10.5 years, 71% male, 44% with cardiomyopathy, LVEF 49.0±11.9%, QRS 134±31 ms), 25 dual-chamber pacemakers, 13 CRT-Ds, 8 CRT-Ps, and 1 ICD were implanted, with 16 involving lead explantation or upgrades. Fluoroscopy times were 6.3±2.9, 6.8±1, and 14.7±4.7 minutes for de novo PPM, ICD, and CRT implants, respectively. LBBA leads were implanted successfully without periprocedural complications. QRS duration shortened by 20±5 ms (P0.001), with no significant changes in tricuspid regurgitation (P=0.11), mitral regurgitation (P=0.27), or LVEF (P=0.5). Conclusion The use of a PA catheter facilitates safer and more efficient LBBA lead placement, reducing fluoroscopy time by one-third compared to published methods.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gill et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Left Bundle Branch Area (LBBA) pacing (n=48). LBB sheath placement using a Pulmonary Artery (PA) catheter was evaluated on Procedural success, fluoroscopy time, and QRS duration change (p=<0.001). Left Bundle Branch Area pacing lead placement using a pulmonary artery catheter was successful without periprocedural complications in 48 patients, shortening QRS duration by 20±5 ms (P<0.001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/698585cb8f7c464f23009651https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.654
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Initial Experience With Implantation Left Bundle Branch Pacing Leads Without a Dedicated Three‐Dimensional Sheath2025
  2. 2Efficacy and safety of left bundle branch area pacing performed with stylet-driven leads2026
  3. 3Transesophageal echocardiography versus fluoroscopy-guided left bundle branch area pacing: a comparative study2026
  4. 4Comprehensive approach and real-life patient registry: exploring management and patient outcomes in dealing with septal complications during left bundle branch area pacing2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Clinical utilization of current pacemakers for left bundle branch area pacing2026