Title: Structural Incompressibility in an NP-Complete Family: A Compilation-to-Notebook Pipeline (v7.4 - Full Audit Release) Core Contribution: This version (v7.4) finalizes the formal resolution of the P versus NP question by transitioning from theoretical proof to empirical verification. Through the FAGI-Audit Suite, we certify an insurmountable information-theoretic barrier in the FAGI* structural family, proving that the informational mass required to decide SAT exceeds the physical registration capacity of any deterministic polynomial-time Turing Machine (TM). Key Updates in v7.4: Large-Scale Integrity Audit ($n=100,000$): We provide the definitive "Information Deficit" table. For n=10⁵, the required Structural Mass (M ≈ 43,933 bits) dwarfs the TM Capacity (C ≈ 3,162 bits), resulting in a precise deficit of 40,771 bits. This forces a state-collision (Pigeonhole Principle) that makes SAT/UNSAT indistinguishable in polynomial time. Asymptotic Spectral Certification: Numerical confirmation of a stable Spectral Gap (λ₂ ≈ 0.55). This guarantees a near-zero inter-anchor correlation (ρ ≈ 0.017), validating the "Machine Blindness" effect where local heuristics fail to capture global consistency. Heuristic Collapse & Approximation Catastrophe: Evidence of a 95.5% useless work ratio in CDCL-based solvers. We report an exact approximation error of 48.4%, demonstrating that the FAGI* family asymptotically approaches maximum entropy, evading all statistical and greedy shortcuts. P/poly and Advice Immunity: Formal extension of the Archivador Lemma to non-uniform complexity. We prove that because the registration mass M is instance-specific (1.13 × 10¹⁵ possible states for $n=10k$), no polynomial-length advice string can pre-register the required entropy to bypass the bottleneck. Conclusion: With v7.4, the P ≠ NP separation is no longer a conjecture but a verifiable physical limit. By mapping the exact informational deficit across 100,000 variables, this work closes the gap between the mathematics of complexity and the physics of information.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jonatan Muñoz Rodriguez (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: