This research identifies and characterizes active stars by analyzing their radio and X-ray emissions, revealing significant correlations and discrepancies.
Radio emission from magnetically active stars arises primarily from non-thermal processes and provides information complementary to their high-energy X-ray emission. Recent advances in sensitive, wide-field radio and X-ray surveys have enabled the identification of larger samples of active stars across the Galaxy. We aim to identify and characterise radio and X-ray-emitting stars in the Galactic plane by combining MeerKAT radio data with soft X-ray observations, and to assess their consistency with the canonical Güdel-Benz relation, which states that the thermal coronal emission observed in soft X-rays is correlated with the non-thermal gyrosynchrotron emission detected in the radio. We cross-matched compact radio sources from the SARAO MeerKAT Galactic Plane Survey with soft X-ray counterparts from the ROSAT All-Sky Survey and the first release of the SRG/eROSITA all-sky survey, the eRASS1. We investigated their radio-brightness temperatures and computed radio and X-ray luminosities to test for consistency with the Güdel--Benz relation. We identify 137 stellar sources with both radio and X-ray detections. Their radio-brightness temperatures, T_B , range from 10^7 to 10^12 K, with the exception of two outliers: AXJ1600.9--5142 (T_B = 4.8 ± 1.5 K) and HD 124831 (T_B = 8 ± 1 K). The remaining sources are consistent with emission from incoherent gyrosynchrotron processes. The sample generally lies below the canonical Güdel--Benz relation, with the offset predominantly driven by enhanced radio luminosities at 1.3 GHz relative to the canonical relation derived at 5 GHz. 10^ 12 10^ 6 Our results suggest that the classical Güdel--Benz relation represents an upper envelope rather than a tight correlation for active stars detected at 1.3 GHz. In addition, the eROSITA detections show that early-type stars are systematically below the łog (L_ ̊m X /L_ ̊m bol ) ∼ -3 relation, which is usually seen for stars of a later spectral type.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Egbo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: