PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 6, 2026Majallah-i dānishgāh-i ̒ulūm-i pizishkī-i Kirmānshāh0 citationsOpen Access

A Comparative Statistical Analysis of Decision Tree and AdaBoost Ensemble for Employee Performance Classification in the Hospitality Sector

THTeguh HerlambangM-Mohamad Yusak Anshori -B-Bambang Suharto -

Key Points

  • This research aims to classify factors affecting employee job satisfaction using Decision Tree and AdaBoost methods.
  • Collected data from Hotel X's Employee Satisfaction Index with 70 records and 9 indicators.
  • Conducted exploratory data analysis, correlation analysis, and label encoding for dataset preparation.
  • Utilized Decision Tree for initial classification modeling, followed by AdaBoost for optimization.
  • Performed three simulations with varying training-to-testing ratios of 70:30, 75:25, and 80:20.
  • AdaBoost improved classification performance consistently across simulations.
  • Achieved the highest accuracy of 93% in the third simulation.
  • Findings highlight the effectiveness of ensemble learning techniques for human resource analytics.

Abstract

This study aims to classify the factors affecting employee job satisfaction in Hotel X using the Decision Tree (DT) and Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost) methods. The hospitality industry relies heavily on human capital to deliver high-quality services, and employee satisfaction is directly linked to service excellence, loyalty, and organizational performance. Data were collected from Hotel X’s internal Employee Satisfaction Index (ESI), comprising 70 records and 9 response indicators across multiple departments. Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA), correlation analysis, and label encoding were performed to prepare the dataset. The Decision Tree was first utilized to model the classification of employee satisfaction levels, followed by optimization using the AdaBoost ensemble method to enhance predictive accuracy. Three simulations were conducted using training-to-testing ratios of 70:30, 75:25, and 80:20, respectively. The results show that AdaBoost consistently improved the classification performance, achieving the highest accuracy of 93% in the third simulation. These findings underscore the significance of ensemble learning techniques in enhancing model reliability for human resource analytics in the hotel industry. This research demonstrates the practical value of combining DT and AdaBoost for workforce data analysis in service-based organizations. The model can be adapted to various industries that prioritize employee satisfaction as a key performance driver.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Herlambang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698586118f7c464f23009e4chttps://doi.org/10.19139/soic-2310-5070-3493
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Strategic Employee Performance Analysis in the USA: Deploying Machine Learning Algorithms Intelligently2024 · 9 citations
  2. 2Enhancing Hotel Performance Prediction in Oman’s Tourism Industry: Insights from Machine Learning, Feature Analysis, and Predictive Factors2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3Improving minority-class detection in employee attrition with ensemble learning and SHAP-Based explanations2026
  4. 4Predicting Employee Turnover in the Financial Company: A Comparative Study of CatBoost and XGBoost Models2024 · 5 citations
  5. 5Optimizing Machine Learning in Hospitality Industry2025 · 2 citations