Theoretical analysis reveals complex excited-state dynamics in curcumin derivatives, suggesting design improvements for future materials.
This theoretical study investigates the photophysical properties and excited-state dynamics of the monocarbonyl curcumin derivative (1E,4E)-1,5-bis(4-dimethylaminophenyl)penta-1,4-dien-3-one (CCM) in aprotic solvents. Using DFT/TD-DFT with the CAM-B3LYP functional and PCM solvation modeling, we analyze the solvent-dependent absorption spectra, π → π ^* π → π ∗ transition, and the large Stokes shifts observed experimentally. The S₀ → S₁ S 0 → S 1 transition demonstrates a mixed contribution from locally excited (LE) and intramolecular charge transfer (CT) characters, showing minimal sensitivity to solvent polarity. The CT component accounts for 68–69% of the electronic reorganization, with charge transfer from the N,N-dimethylaniline (donor) units to the divinyl ketone (acceptor) core, as indicated by natural transition orbitals (NTOs) and Hirshfeld population analysis. XMS-CASPT2 multiconfigurational calculations corroborate the TD-DFT picture, revealing a bright ¹(π π ^*) 1 ( π π ∗ ) state containing a mixture of LE and CT character. Gas-phase excited-state optimizations show that the lowest excited state is an ¹(nπ ^*) 1 ( n π ∗ ) dark state with negligible oscillator strength, while the bright ¹(π π ^*) 1 ( π π ∗ ) state lies slightly above it; consequently, fluorescence originates from the relaxed ¹(π π ^*) 1 ( π π ∗ ) minimum. Large Stokes shift (3607 to 5773 cm ⁻¹ - 1 ) has been linearly correlated with solvent polarity by Lippert-Mataga plot (R = 0.985), driven by dipole moment changes ( Δ μ ~ 3.1-3.6 Δ μ ∼ 3.1 - 3.6 Debye) upon excitation. Calculations reproduce experimental absorption and emission trends, that is, the redshift in polar solvents, and validate CAM-B3LYP for curcumin derivatives. This work elucidates the mixed ICT-LE character in various solvents and provides design insights for fluorophores in sensing and optoelectronics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Araújo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: