PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 6, 2026PLoS ONE0 citationsOpen Access

Determinants of return to HIV treatment after interruption on ART among HIV positive clients in Katakwi District, Uganda

View Full Paper
WOWilliam Patrick Odhiambo OkelloSSSaadick Mugerwa SsentongoBOBonniface Oryokot

Key Points

  • The study aims to identify determinants influencing the return to HIV treatment following interruptions.
  • Conducted a cross-sectional study at three ART clinics in Katakwi District.
  • Collected data through face-to-face interviews with adult participants.
  • Analyzed data using Poisson generalized estimating equations (GEE) to assess associations with return to care.
  • 63.9% of clients successfully returned to care after interruption.
  • Clients without an occupation were less likely to return to treatment (aRR = 0.80).
  • Those living within 5 km of a facility were also less likely to return compared to those 5–10 km away (aRR = 0.78).
  • Positive community beliefs about treatment significantly increased return likelihood (aRR = 1.18).
  • Belonging to a community support group also increased return likelihood (aRR = 1.16).

Abstract

Background Returning to treatment following interruptions is crucial for achieving optimal HIV care outcomes. In Uganda, despite a 20% treatment interruption rate, only 58% of clients successfully resume treatment. Evidence on determinants of returning to treatment remains limited. This study aimed to identify determinants of return to HIV treatment after interruption in Katakwi District, Uganda. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study at three high-volume antiretroviral therapy (ART) clinics in Katakwi District. Data were collected using face-to-face interviews from study adult participants and analyzed using Poisson generalized estimating equations (GEE) with robust standard errors to identify factors independently associated with a return to care. Results The rate of return to care was 63.9%. Clients without an occupation were less likely to return (aRR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.73–0.88, p < 0.001). Surprisingly, those living within 5 km of a facility were also less likely to return compared to those 5–10 km away (aRR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.63–0.95, p = 0.019). Positive community beliefs about treatment adherence significantly increased the likelihood of returning (aRR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.06–1.33, p = 0.003), as did belonging to a community support group (aRR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.01–1.39, p = 0.04). Conclusion Return to HIV care was associated with occupation, distance to the facility, community beliefs, and belonging to a community support group. Interventions to improve re-engagement should include targeted economic support for unemployed clients, community-based anti-stigma campaigns, flexible clinic hours, and improved rural access through mobile clinics. Continuous client education at both the facility and community levels is essential.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Okello et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698586238f7c464f2300a1f1https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0337637
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper