PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 6, 2026International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics1 citationsOpen Access

Hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum disorder: Impact of institutional surgical volume on patient outcomes

View Full Paper
LBLacey BrennanMount Sinai HospitalOBOlga BougieMount Sinai HospitalJSJonas ShellenbergerInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences

Key Points

  • To assess the impact of surgical volume on maternal outcomes following hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum disorder.
  • Conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study in Ontario, Canada.
  • Included patients aged 18–50 years who underwent hysterectomy for PAS from 2003 to 2022.
  • Defined high-volume centers as those performing≥9 PAS hysterectomies annually.
  • Analyzed maternal outcomes such as severe maternal morbidity (SMM), ICU admission, and hospital stay.
  • High-volume centers had significantly lower rates of SMM compared to low-volume centers (45.0% vs. 71.7%).
  • Reduced risk of massive transfusion (aRR 0.57) and ICU admission (aRR 0.30) at high-volume centers.
  • Shorter length of hospital stay at high-volume centers (1.88 days vs. 3.90 days).
  • Each additional PAS hysterectomy per year reduces SMM risk by 3% (aRR 0.97).

Abstract

Abstract Objective To evaluate trends in hysterectomy case volume for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorder over time and compare maternal outcomes between high‐ and low‐volume centers. Specifically, we examined whether surgical volume influences severe maternal morbidity (SMM) and other key perioperative outcomes. Methods We conducted a population‐based retrospective cohort study of patients aged 18–50 years who underwent hysterectomy for PAS in Ontario, Canada, from January 1, 2003, to January 1, 2022. Cases were identified using provincial administrative health databases. High‐volume centers were defined as institutions performing ≥9 PAS hysterectomies annually, based on probability modeling and receiver operating characteristic analysis. The primary outcome was a validated composite measure of SMM, including massive transfusion, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, surgical complications, readmission, and length of hospital stay. Results Among 778 patients, 151 were treated at high‐volume centers. These patients experienced significantly lower rates of SMM compared to those treated at low‐volume centers (45.0% vs. 71.7%; adjusted relative risk aRR 0.59, 95% confidence interval CI: 0.49–0.72). Risks of massive transfusion (aRR 0.57, 95% CI: 0.47–0.70) and ICU admission (aRR 0.30, 95% CI: 0.15–0.58) were also markedly reduced. Length of hospital stay was shorter at high‐volume centers (1.88 vs. 3.90 days; P < 0.0001). Each additional PAS hysterectomy performed in the prior year at a given institution was associated with a 3% reduction in SMM risk (aRR 0.97, 95% CI: 0.96–0.98). Conclusion High‐volume centers demonstrate significantly better maternal outcomes for PAS hysterectomy. These findings support centralizing PAS care to improve patient safety and surgical outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Brennan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698586ad8f7c464f2300a633https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.70846
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper