Key result
Higher cardiac output and power during isolated PVAD support are linked to survival.
Why the study?
Do temporal trends of hemodynamic functional indices differ between survivors and deceased patients receiving isolated PVAD or ECPELLA therapy?
Cohort (n=400)
Yes
Do temporal trends of hemodynamic functional indices differ between survivors and deceased patients receiving isolated PVAD or ECPELLA therapy?
Continuous monitoring of hemodynamic indices such as cardiac output and cardiac power output can help differentiate survivors from non-survivors during mechanical circulatory support and may be clinically useful during the weaning process.
Background/Introduction Continuous monitoring of hemodynamic functional indices during mechanical circulatory support (MCS) therapy may provide a better understanding of systemic flow and cardiovascular loadings in cardiogenic shock. Purpose This study aims to describe the temporal trends of hemodynamic functional indices in patients receiving isolated percutaneous ventricular assist device (PVAD) or combination therapy with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) (i.e. ECPELLA) in the UNLOADERS-PVAD registry, a Japanese multicenter registry with an extensive collection of longitudinal hemodynamic indices using invasive monitoring in patients using PVAD. Methods Using mixed effect models with random intercept and slope, cardiac output (CO) and pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) were analyzed from before, immediately after, and 24 hours after PVAD initiation to immediately before MCS termination. Similarly, cardiac power output (CPO) was described from before, 24 hours after PVAD initiation to immediately before MCS termination. Temporal trends were described in the survivors and the deceased during hospitalization in patients with isolated PVAD therapy and ECPELA therapy with VA-ECMO termination followed by PVAD termination. Of note, pressures and CO used to estimate the hemodynamic functional indices were measured using a pulmonary artery catheter. The observation time points for CPO were dependent on the availability of blood pressure measurements. Results Among 206 patients (mean age 70 years, 74% male) who received isolated PVAD therapy, 46 (22.3%) died during the hospitalization. CO and CPO were consistently higher in the survivors of the isolated PVAD therapy (predicted marginal means above 3.0 L/kg/min and 0.5 W, respectively) than in those who died during the hospitalization (Figure 1). PAPi was similar between the survivors and the deceased throughout the isolated PVAD therapy. In 194 patients (mean age 64 years, 73% male) who received ECPELLA therapy, 96 (49%) died during hospitalization. The differences in CO and CPO during the initial phases of MCS therapy were subtle between the survivors and the deceased (Figure 2). Meanwhile, CO and CPO rapidly improved from 24 hours after PVAD initiation to VA-ECMO and PVAD termination in the survivors (Figure 2). The temporal trend of PAPi in patients with ECPELLA therapy appeared to have marginal differences between the survivors and the deceased. Conclusions A higher CO and CPO at any given time during MCS therapy appears to ensure better outcomes in patients with isolated PVAD therapy. The differences in such indices were compelling moments before MCS termination in patients with ECPELLA therapy. Continuous monitoring of hemodynamic functional indices in ECPELLA therapy may be clinically useful during the MCS weaning process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Teramoto et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Cardiogenic shock requiring mechanical circulatory support (n=400). Hemodynamic functional indices (CO, CPO, PAPi) vs. Deceased patients (lower indices) was evaluated on Temporal trends of hemodynamic functional indices in survivors versus deceased. Higher cardiac output (>3.0 L/kg/min) and cardiac power output (>0.5 W) during isolated PVAD therapy were consistently associated with survival compared to patients who died (22.3% mortality).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: