This evaluation reveals the diagnostic performance of the Cepheid 3-gene test for tuberculosis disease, suggesting room for improvement against WHO targets.
To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the Cepheid 3-gene Host Response Test (Xpert-MTB-HR) for tuberculosis disease (TBD). Among 1,128 participants enrolled in this study, 740 were diagnosed with TBD, and the remaining 388 were classified as Non-TB participants, including 218 cases of other pulmonary diseases (OPD), 48 cases of TB infection (TBI), and 122 healthy controls (HC). TB scores were obtained for all participants using the Xpert-MTB-HR assay, and diagnostic performance was evaluated by ROC curves and AUC. The corresponding AUCs of the TB score for distinguishing TBD from non-TB, HC, OPD, and TBI were 0.717 (95% CI, 0.686-0.748; sensitivity 63.6%, specificity 72.7%), 0.846 (95% CI, 0.814-0.878; sensitivity 70.9%, specificity 88.5%), 0.625 (95% CI, 0.583-0.667; sensitivity 54.9%, specificity 67.9%), and 0.807 (95% CI, 0.761-0.853; sensitivity 60.6%, specificity 93.8%), respectively. TB scores were negatively correlated with bacterial load and C-reactive protein levels (both p < 0.001). Differences in TB scores were observed across treatment duration groups in this cross-sectional analysis. Xpert MTB-HR did not fully meet WHO performance targets in the overall population, with performance influenced by pathogen load, particularly in low bacterial load or post-treatment patients. TB score showed patterns consistent with treatment response, warranting longitudinal validation. Not applicable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: