Online fault diagnosis is crucial for improving the reliability of safety–critical industrial systems. Fault diagnosis becomes increasingly complex if the time-variations, fuzziness, and uncertain causal relationships related to the various internal factors in the system are present. In view of the time-varying working conditions of industrial systems, as well as the fuzzy uncertainty of fault data and knowledge, a C-DUCG (Cubic dynamic uncertain causality graph) approach is proposed for fault diagnosis. Such a solution is intended to help develop a generative cubic causality graph modeling scheme and a FUTURE (fuzzy temporal causality reasoning) algorithm, both of which facilitate the representation and reasoning about complex fault situations (involving temporal causalities and uncertain evidence). In C-DUCG, the strategies of causality simplification and EELA (event-oriented early logical absorption) are proposed to mitigate the complexities of modeling and reasoning. Comparative experiments and a sequence of fault diagnosis tests on a nuclear power plant (NPP) simulator validate the efficiency, recall, accuracy, and interpretability of C-DUCG in large-scale dynamic systems. Experiments reveal that the proposed algorithm achieves 0.62 and 0.999 in terms of recall rate AC@1 and AC@k, respectively, with the average reasoning time being 10 ms, and the average time spent in NPP fault diagnosis tests is 9.42 ms.
Dong et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: