PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026Plant Science Today0 citationsOpen Access

Weed dynamics and crop productivity in kharif rice (Oryza sativa L.) under different establishment methods and herbicide treatments

BNBegum NasrinBangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical UniversityMSMeher SunitaCenturion University of Technology and ManagementGBGhose BikramjeetCenturion University of Technology and Management

Key Points

  • The study aims to assess how herbicides and establishment methods affect weed management and rice productivity.
  • Conducted during the kharif season at Centurion University in Odisha.
  • Employs a split-plot design with two establishment methods: transplanted rice (TPR) and dry-seeded rice (DSR).
  • Utilizes five weed management treatments including both herbicides and hand weeding.
  • The test rice variety used is RNR-15048.
  • Transplanted rice (TPR) demonstrated 35% higher weed control efficiency compared to dry-seeded rice (DSR).
  • W3 herbicide treatment achieved 83-93% weed control efficiency, only 5-18% less effective than hand weeding.
  • W3 produced the highest benefit-cost ratio of 1.66 despite hand weeding yielding more.
  • TPR showed a 33% higher benefit-cost ratio than DSR.

Abstract

The present study was conducted during the kharif season of 2024 at the Post Graduate Research Farm, M S Swaminathan School of Agriculture, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Paralakhemundi, Odisha. The objective was to evaluate the effect of herbicides on weed dynamics and crop productivity under different establishment methods. The experiment was laid out in a split-plot design with 2 main plots and 10 subplots, replicated thrice. The main plots consisted of 2 establishment methods: transplanted rice (TPR) and dry-seeded rice (DSR). Subplots included 5 weed management treatments: W1 to W5, comprising combinations of pre- and post-emergence herbicides, W4: hand weeding (HW) and a weedy check (W5), using the test variety RNR-15048. TPR exhibited superior weed suppression (35 % higher WCE), improved growth, yield attributes and recorded 33 % higher yield over DSR. Among weed control treatments, W3 (Pretilachlor 600 g ha-1 PE fb Pyrazosulfuron ethyl 10 % WP 20 g ha-1 at 20 DAT/S) was most effective, with 83–93 % weed control efficiency which was only 5–18 % less than HW. Though HW achieved the highest yield, W3 registered the highest benefit-cost (B:C) ratio of 1.66, outperforming HW due to reduced labour dependency, which resulted in a 41 % lower B:C ratio in HW. Despite higher cultivation costs, TPR showed a 33 % higher B:C ratio than DSR. Thus, W3 in either TPR or DSR is recommended as a labour-saving and cost-effective weed management strategy, especially vital amidst growing labour scarcity in Indian agriculture.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nasrin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6988270a0fc35cd7a8845e14https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.10370
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper