Key result
Severe aortic stenosis linked to ~2.3-fold higher risk of ascending aortic dilation in BAV.
Observational (n=4,196)
No
Age and aortic stenosis severity are independent predictors of ascending aortic dilation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve, suggesting a need for intensified imaging surveillance in elderly patients with severe stenosis.
Background Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), the most common congenital cardiac malformation (prevalence 1-2%), is strongly associated with ascending aortic dilation (20-84% incidence), a life-threatening risk factor for aortic dissection. Early identification of predictive factors is critical for risk stratification and clinical management. Methods This retrospective study analyzed 4,196 BAV patients from our hospital (2023–2024). Exclusion criteria included connective tissue disorders. Variables included demographics, Sievers classification, aortic stenosis severity (echocardiography), comorbidities, and ascending aortic diameter. Univariate/multivariate logistic regression identified predictors of dilation (defined as ≥40 mm). Results Of 4,196 patients, 1,444 (34%) had ascending aortic dilation. Univariate analysis linked age (P<0.01), sex (P=0.03), BAV morphology (P=0.02), aortic stenosis severity (P<0.01), hypertension (P=0.04), and baseline aortic diameter (P<0.01) to dilation. Multivariate analysis confirmed age (OR=1.05, 95% CI 1.02–1.08) and aortic stenosis severity (OR=2.34, 95% CI 1.78–3.07) as independent predictors (both P<0.01). Discussion: Aging accelerates aortic wall degradation (elastic fiber fragmentation) and reduces structural integrity, while stenosis-induced hemodynamic stress exacerbates dilation. BAV patients inherently exhibit aortic wall abnormalities (e.g., cystic medial necrosis), compounding risk. These mechanisms highlight the synergistic role of age and stenosis in dilation progression. Conclusion Age and aortic stenosis severity independently predict ascending aortic dilation in BAV patients. Elderly patients with severe stenosis warrant intensified imaging surveillance to enable early intervention and mitigate complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Bicuspid aortic valve (n=4,196). Aortic stenosis severity was evaluated on Ascending aortic dilation (≥40 mm) (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.78-3.07, p=<0.01). Aortic stenosis severity independently predicted ascending aortic dilation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (OR 2.34; 95% CI 1.78-3.07; P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: