Wear, a critical factor governing the performance and durability of mechanical systems, is typically characterized using point-contact and line-contact test configurations. However, it remains unclear whether the wear trends observed in one test configuration would be observed in the other configuration under the same nominal conditions. In this study, ball-on-disk (ASTM G99) and block-on-ring (ASTM G77) tests were conducted under an identical maximum Hertzian contact stress and sliding speed, using the same material pair and lubricating oil, to clarify which contact configuration exhibits more wear and why. The results show that, under the same Hertzian contact stress, the line-contact configuration exhibits a specific wear rate two orders of magnitude higher than the point-contact configuration, despite exhibiting a lower and more stable coefficient of friction. The disk wear is negligible and the ball shows only mild material loss, whereas the line-contact system displays wear rates several orders of magnitude higher, with the rotating ring contributing the dominant share of the total wear. White-light interferometry and scanning electron microscopy observations reveal directional, groove-dominated surface morphologies on the ball and disk, while wear on the block is confined to edge-localized regions and the worn ring surface has smooth, polished morphology. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy confirms that a Zn- and P-rich tribofilm forms exclusively on the ring surface. Finite element analysis shows stress amplification at the finite line-contact edges, explaining the observed wear severity. These results demonstrate that matching Hertzian contact stress alone is insufficient to ensure comparable wear behavior between point and line contacts.
Chen et al. (Thu,) studied this question.