PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026Urban Lifeline0 citationsOpen Access

Hybrid machine learning framework for transverse cracking prediction in CRCP with PSO and GBM

AAAli AlnaqbiGAGhazi G. Al-KhateebWZWaleed Zeiada

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a predictive framework to accurately forecast transverse cracking in continuously reinforced concrete pavement.
  • Hybrid framework combining particle swarm optimization and gradient boosting machine.
  • Analysis of 395 records from Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) program.
  • Optimization of GBM hyperparameters using PSO.
  • Sensitivity analysis to determine significant factors influencing crack formation.
  • Optimized PSO-GBM model achieved an average RMSE of 1.62 and R2 of 0.99.
  • Model performance surpassed benchmark approaches including conventional GBM, random forest, and SVR.
  • L3 thickness, L4 thickness, and Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) identified as key factors affecting cracking.

Abstract

Abstract Transverse cracking is a major distress mechanism in Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavement (CRCP), affecting ride smoothness, service life, and maintenance strategies. This research introduces a hybrid predictive framework that couples Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) with Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) to enhance the accuracy of transverse crack prediction in CRCP. The analysis utilized 395 records from 33 pavement sections obtained from the Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) program, encompassing structural, environmental, traffic, and performance-related parameters. PSO was applied to fine-tune critical GBM hyperparameters, namely the number of iterations, learning rate, and tree depth. The optimized PSO–GBM model demonstrated excellent performance, yielding an average RMSE of 1.62 and an R 2 of 0.99 under 5-fold cross-validation, surpassing benchmark models such as conventional GBM, Random Forest, Support Vector Regression (SVR), Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), and Linear Regression. Sensitivity analysis revealed that L3 thickness, L4 thickness, and Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) were the most significant contributors, consistent with engineering knowledge of crack development. Validation through residual distribution and equality line plots confirmed the robustness and stability of the proposed approach across varying severity levels.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alnaqbi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6988277b0fc35cd7a88463ddhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s44285-025-00061-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper