PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026Infant and Child Development0 citationsOpen Access

Psychometric Evaluation of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire ( SDQ ) in Central Taiwan: Assessing Mental Health in School Children

View Full Paper
JYJing‐Jung YangFu Jen Catholic UniversityHYHsi‐chu YangNational Chung Cheng UniversityJLJhih‐Yuan LuTaipei Medical University

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess the psychometric properties of the SDQ in school children from Changhua County, Taiwan.
  • Analyzed data from 1008 elementary school students aged 7-12
  • Collected questionnaires from parents, teachers, and self-reports from students in grades 5-6
  • Established normative data and cutoff scores based on findings
  • Conducted exploratory factor analysis to evaluate the questionnaire structure
  • Reliability was generally satisfactory but weaker for peer and conduct problem subscales
  • Inter-rater correlations were modest, particularly between teachers and other informants
  • Exploratory factor analysis partially supported the intended structure of the questionnaire

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) has been validated across many cultural settings, yet evidence from Taiwan is scarce and derives mainly from metropolitan populations. No data are available from Changhua County, central Taiwan—an area with a strong agricultural profile and socio‐demographic characteristics distinct from the more urbanised north and south. After exclusions, valid data from 1008 elementary school students (ages 7–12) were analysed. Parents and teachers completed questionnaires for all children, and students in grades 5–6 provided self‐reports. Normative data and percentile‐based cutoff scores were established. Reliability was generally satisfactory, though weaker for peer and conduct problem subscales, particularly in self‐reports. Inter‐rater correlations were modest ( r = 0.15–0.48), with especially low agreement between teachers and other informants on emotional symptoms. Exploratory factor analysis partially supported the intended structure. These findings demonstrate that while the SDQ is a practical tool for school‐based screening in Taiwan, peer and conduct domains require cautious interpretation and socio‐demographic context should be considered when applying the instrument across different regions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698827a20fc35cd7a88467b7https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.70088
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)2003 · 924 citations
  2. 2Psychometric Properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire2001 · 6,901 citations
  3. 3The validity, reliability and normative scores of the parent, teacher and self report versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in China2008 · 468 citations
  4. 4Comparing Psychiatric Diagnoses Generated by the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire with Diagnoses Made by Clinicians2004 · 106 citations
  5. 5Validation of the Chinese version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in Hong Kong2009 · 211 citations