Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Phase 1/2 trial reveals NXT007 improves coagulation with fewer side effects in hemophilia A patients.
NXT007 is a next-generation, activated factor VIII (FVIIIa)-mimetic bispecific antibody under investigation in the phase 1/2 NXTAGE trial (jRCT2080224835). Here, we report the primary analysis of the multiple-ascending-dose Part B in people with hemophilia A (PwHA). Eligible participants were men with severe HA without FVIII inhibitors. Four dose cohorts (B1-B4) were planned, with NXT007 administered subcutaneously at maintenance doses of 0.072 mg/kg, 0.28 mg/kg, 0.70 mg/kg, and 1.08 mg/kg, respectively, every 4 weeks. Primary endpoints were safety (adverse events [AEs] and serious AEs [SAEs]), tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy; secondary endpoints included incidence of anti-NXT007 antibodies (ADAs). Participants in cohorts B1 (n=10), B2 (n=6), B3 (n=6), and B4 (n=8) had received NXT007 for a median (minimum-maximum) of 114.1 (29-140), 96.4 (88-112), 58.1 (52-72), and 22.2 (4-28) weeks, respectively. Two participants discontinued treatment: NXT007-unrelated AE (n=1) and complete loss of NXT007 exposure due to ADAs (n=1). Participants' plasma NXT007 concentration showed a dose-dependent increase, and predicted FVIII-equivalent activity reached a non-hemophilic level (≥40 IU/dL) in B2 onwards. NXT007 had a favorable safety profile at all doses. Most AEs were mild/moderate and all three SAEs were considered unrelated to NXT007. Mean annualized treated bleed rates were 1.48 (B1), 0.28 (B2), 0.00 (B3), and 0.00 (B4). Pharmacokinetics-affecting NXT007 ADAs were observed in two participants, including the participant in B1 who discontinued. NXTAGE Part B demonstrates that NXT007 could provide non-hemophilic coagulation activity in PwHA, with a less burdensome dose regimen than currently available therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
NOGAMI et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: