PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026Critical Pathways in Cardiology A Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine0 citations

Efficacy and Safety of Mavacamten and Aficamten in Obstructive and Non-obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

View Full Paper
MIMuhammad IbrahimAKAamna KashifSAS M Washaqul Arfin

Key Result

Mavacamten and aficamten significantly reduced LVOT gradients by ~57 mmHg, improved NYHA class (RR 1.94) and biomarkers, with increased adverse events (RR 1.07) in HCM patients.

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cardiac myosin inhibitors in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
  • Conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs)
  • Included adults with obstructive and non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
  • Searched multiple databases up to September 2025
  • Analyzed outcomes using random-effects models for biomarkers and echocardiographic measurements
  • Cardiac myosin inhibitors significantly improved resting and post-Valsalva left ventricular outflow tract gradient
  • Increased likelihood of New York Heart Association class improvement
  • NT-proBNP and cardiac troponin I levels declined
  • Demonstrated an increase in adverse events, primarily hypertension

Structured PICO

Do cardiac myosin inhibitors improve hemodynamics, functional status, and biomarkers compared to placebo in adults with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?

P
Population
1,406 adults with obstructive and non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) pooled from 7 RCTs
I
Intervention
Cardiac myosin inhibitors (mavacamten and aficamten)
C
Comparator
Placebo
O
Outcome
Resting and post-Valsalva LVOT gradientsurrogate

Cardiac myosin inhibitors significantly improve hemodynamics, functional status, and biomarkers in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, though they are associated with a modest decrease in LVEF and an increase in adverse events such as hypertension.

Limitations

  • long-term outcomes require confirmation

Abstract

Cardiac myosin inhibitors (CMIs) are novel, disease-modifying therapies for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy of CMIs versus placebo in patients with HCM. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving adults with obstructive and non-obstructive HCM was performed following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and registered on PROSPERO. Database including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched through September 2025. Random-effects models were performed using SMDs for biomarker and WMDs for echocardiographic parameters. RRs were calculated for dichotomous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals. Seven RCTs, comprising 1,406 patients (732 CMI; 674 placebo) were included. CMIs significantly improved resting (WMD: −57.27 mmHg −63.05, −51.49; p < 0.001) and post-Valsalva LVOT gradient (WMD: −55.87 mmHg −63.05, −51.49; p < 0.001). LVEF decreased modestly (WMD: −4.74% −7.22, −2.26; p = 0.0002). CMIs increased the likelihood of ≥1 NYHA class improvement (RR: 1.94 1.37, 2.74; p < 0.001) and KCCQ-CSS (WMD: +6.60 points 3.84, 9.35; p < 0.001). NT-proBNP (WMD: -13.35 -18.04, -8.67; p < 0.001) and cardiac troponin I (WMD: -11.90 -15.07, -8.73; p < 0.001) declined. Peak oxygen uptake showed no overall change (WMD: +0.64 mL/kg/min −0.18, 1.47; p = 0.12). CMIs increased adverse events (RR: 1.07 1.02, 1.13; p = 0.008), particularly hypertension (RR: 2.19 1.06, 4.53; p = 0.03). CMIs improve hemodynamics, functional status, and biomarkers in HCM with an acceptable safety profile and hold promise as disease-modifying therapy, though long-term outcomes require confirmation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ibrahim et al. (2026) studied this question. Mavacamten and aficamten significantly reduced LVOT gradients by ~57 mmHg, improved NYHA class (RR 1.94) and biomarkers, with increased adverse events (RR 1.07) in HCM patients.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698827a20fc35cd7a88468f8https://doi.org/10.1097/hpc.0000000000000418
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper