Qualitative study identifies barriers and facilitators to parent-led infant pain care in rural settings, suggesting strategies for improvement.
Aims To support the implementation of parent-led infant pain care by identifying barriers and facilitators during acute procedures.Methods We conducted a qualitative descriptive study guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and COM-B Model. We completed individual, virtual, semi-structured interviews with health system participants (hospital and community-based health care providers, clinical leaders, and administrators; n = 10) and parent participants (who had used hospital or community-based perinatal services in the last 12 months; n = 14) and analyzed the data using deductive-inductive qualitative content analysis.Results Thirty-two themes were identified across the capability (9 themes), opportunity (13 themes), and motivation (10 themes) domains of the COM-B Model. Participants emphasized the influence of environmental context, resources, and social factors on the use of breastfeeding and skin-to-skin contact to manage infant pain across rural acute and community care settings. Health system and parent participants described similar barriers and facilitators, highlighting the inconsistent implementation of parent-led infant pain care.Conclusions The barriers and facilitators identified in this study will inform the development of theory-informed, contextually relevant implementation interventions to support the use of best practice infant pain care in rural contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Benoit et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: